Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Evaluation of adsorption capacity of acetaminophen on activated charcoal dosage forms available in Nigeria by in vitro adsorption studies and scanning electron microscopy

Margaret O Ilomuanya1,2 , Angela F Ohere2, Sa’adat A Zubair1, Uloma Ubani-Ukoma1

1Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lagos, PMB 12003, Surulere, Lagos, Nigeria; 2School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Jalan Broga, 4300 Semenyih, Malaysia.

For correspondence:-  Margaret Ilomuanya   Email: milomuanya@unilag.edu.ng

Received: 15 December 2016        Accepted: 17 April 2017        Published: 30 May 2017

Citation: Ilomuanya MO, Ohere AF, Zubair SA, Ubani-Ukoma U. Evaluation of adsorption capacity of acetaminophen on activated charcoal dosage forms available in Nigeria by in vitro adsorption studies and scanning electron microscopy. Trop J Pharm Res 2017; 16(5):1105-1112 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v16i5.19

© 2017 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate varying dosage forms of activated charcoal obtained from community pharmacy outlets in Nigeria for their adsorption capacity when challenged with acetaminophen.
Methods: Equilibruim kinetics of acetaminophen adsorption onto activated charcoal surface was determined via batch studies at different adsorbent:adsorbate ratios. The isotherm adsorption experiment was carried out at 37 oC and langmuir isotherm models were utilized to describe the equilibrium kinetics data with characterization of adsorption site and porosity elucidated via scanning electron microscopy.
Results: A preponderance of microporosity was observed on the  surface of the powder activated charcoal. Maximum adsorption capacity (MAC) of 299.78 mg/g was obtained using activated charcoal powder (276.11; 321.09) at 95 % confidence interval (CI), allowing for maximum adsorption of acetaminophen at pH 1.2. Mixed pore structures, which were not clearly established, were observed with both the tablets and capsules with MAC of 280.54 mg/g (273.22; 290.08) and 140.01 mg/g (135.32; 153.99), respectively at pH 1.2. MAC data at pH 6.5 showed little variation from those obtained at pH 1.2 (p < 0.05 95 % CI).
Conclusion: The presence of excipients in the tablets and capsules caused a retardation in adsorption via intraparticle diffusion especially at basal micropore sites on the activated charcoal surface. Activated charcoal powder is superior to other dosage forms for use in countering acetaminophen poisoning

Keywords: Acetaminophen, Adsorption, Isotherms, Activated charcoal, Scanning electron microcopy

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates